Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Why aren't these Environmental screwballs letting us drill oil in our own country?

Do they not realize the effect that these high rate oil prices will have on our economy?Why aren't these Environmental screwballs letting us drill oil in our own country?
I think they are thinking about long term rather than short term economic and environmental values, you know for those who will inherit the earth!Why aren't these Environmental screwballs letting us drill oil in our own country?
Yes drilling there will bring prices down...





We aren't allowed to drill because it ruins the environment...





We have enough supply to last us decades and enough coal to last us over a hundred years. Thanks Congress for doing nothing on an important issue!





To Congress: Now since you have made this mess, get the oil companies exec's to capitol hill and blame them! Quit pointing fingers and do something about it yourself.
It boils down to one thing. The squeaky wheel gets the grease. The environmental screwballs are the squeakiest wheel in D.C.





Washington needs to hear us. We need to get squeaky so they'll give us some oil. (Pun intended)





As I see it, you only have three choices.


1.) Cut back on your gas consumption.


2.) Grin and bare it.


3.) Do something about it and tell your congressman how you feel. This is a letter I sent to my congressman. Pass it around. Change your representative’s name. Then when you complain, at least you can say you tried something. I equate it to those who don't vote and then complain about who's in office.





https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtm...


will put you in touch with your congressman.





Dear Representative Geoff Davis,





I believe it's time to change our policy in regards to drilling for oil off our own shores. Refuge (ANWR) and the offshore areas of the Pacific and Atlantic coasts contain a huge amount of oil that would drastically reduce (if not eliminate) our dependency on foreign oil. If we can't do anything about the vast profits ';big oil'; is raking in, at least we can allow them to reinvest these profits into weaning us off foreign oil.





Times have changed in reference to environmental protection. Modern technology minimizes the environmental impact to a point where it is practically non-existent. I'm sure legislation could be worded to ensure environmental impact is minimized.





Even if we allow drilling for more oil, I don't believe the big oil companies are really interested in finding it. Limited supply means more profit. Here are a couple of scenarios for your consideration.





Break up the oil monopoly. In my opinion they are acting together as one (not competing against each other) to drive the costs of fuel up. Break up the chain and you will produce competition. Make it unlawful for the oil companies to also own the refineries or distribution chains. When the owner of the refinery is shopping for oil, the oil companies are going to compete to get the business.





It is my understanding that OPEC really only wants ~ $68 for a barrel of oil. It’s the speculators that bid it up from there. If the government were buying the oil – it would take the speculators out of the equation. Why can’t our government buy the oil and then sell it to the refineries for or a very low profit? I am a life long republican and not usually in support a more government, I don’t think this qualifies as it could sustain itself with a very low (zero wash) profit.





Most of all, lets end “big oil” lobbying efforts in Washington. Oil is the life’s blood of this nation. Catering to their interests is unpatriotic when most of them are not even owned by Americans.





I know your knowledge probably exceeds mine in these matters. I am not an expert, just a VERY concerned citizen/voter. As our elected representative, my hope is that you can help before our nation goes into a depression. One hurricane in the gulf and we'll be in trouble.





Thank you for your help,
Because all it accomplishes is a very slight delay (10 - 20 years) of the inevitable, and at great cost. The longer you delay dealing with the inevitable the more it will cost you when you DO deal with it. When the engine light comes on in your car, do you fix the problem? or do you just stick some black tape over the light and pretend everything is OK?





Your great grandchildren are going to need to live here too someday. Try looking at where ';America %26amp; Co'; is going to be in 50 or 100 years instead of just trying to look good on this year's report. Or maybe you think cost vs benefit based analysis and long range planning is ';screwball';?
UGh we are drilling in our own Country . I personally had part in about 150 wells in the USA. most fo them offshore Gulf of mexico. There has been a huge discovery in the gulf. one of wells we drilling estimated to produce over a billion barrels per day. many that are already been drilled have been capped for futire completions and producing. all over the usa on land is drilling. where i live there is about 20 drilling rigs with in a 50 mile radius .. but we can drill more and more but do you not realize the usa hasn't built a new refinary since the 70's if we had more refinerys. then that could also help but with the huge cost of building a refinery it want lower prices over night. just drilling doesnt put gas in your car. from drilling it miles and miles benath the earths surface its a long process before it makes it to the chevron station Lot of time, Lot of Money . with the high prices your oilcampnies are also suffering do you know how much Your Oil cmapnies pay per day to drilling companies to drill these wells. anywhere from 100,000.00$ to 500,000.00$ per day plus equipment. and tools thats used is not available at walmart. And it reqires fuel and oil to drill the wells, more fuel to produce the wells, transport it, refinery costs. lot of costs in there. To many people are investing in oil to become millionaires. one person is your president and his frienfds and family if you invest a million $ in real estate in 15 years time you want to be able to gain a little there dont you. same here so many people have invested millions into oil stocks etc. well they gotta show a profit some how and the best way is with our pocket books, there is no winning this. get used to it..
I am an environmentalist whom agrees we should explore sources of oil inside of America. But the fact remains that these new drilling sites will have a tiny impact, if any, on the price of oil and our country's economy. What we really need to do is explore our other options as we try to ween ourselves off of oil as gently as possible.
because they are idiots....they think it's ok for opec countries to drill for oil...they don't care about that....like them drilling for oil is somehow not affecting ';climate change'; or hurting the enviroment.....and when we tried to get alternative energy like windmills on the ocean going, helping to aleviate our energy needs, teddy kennedy screamed bloody murder because it would be a eye sore to him personallly....they are pure evil...
environmentalist have no control over these matters,congress does,but the democrats have always been against it.but tell me why if republican are so for building new refineries,why didn't they just do it when they controlled all 3 branches of government for 6 years straight





it would have been as simple as drafted a bill voting on it and getting the president to sign it,bush didn't veto a single bill put on his desk by republicans for 6 years straight and democrats couldn't do anything they didn't have enough votes to stop anything
I think it has something with the organization Greenpeace paying off the democrats. Over the last 12 years there have been 24 votes on drilling in the Alaskan ANWR. In 1996 when the republicans had control of the house and senate, it got passed. But our dear friend and former president Clinton vetoed it. The Republican party wants to explore for oil here, but the dem's don't. I thought these politicians were to have Americans well-being at heart. Apparently not. Their main job is to get re-elected. Nothing else matters to them. You see, the democrats have put us in the position of having to buy unaffordable gasoline. They ride in limousines, and we pay for the gas.
Getting more oil now seems like a good idea, and i am in favor of drilling in alaska, don't get me wrong, but i think that if we don't at least start looking at alternative fuel sources, we will never overcome the oil crisis. We won't solve any problems that way. Just think a few years into the future. Then gas will be even more expensive than it is now. I'm sure we don't want that right?
Cause they are dumb and would rather raise food prices as well by trying to create ethanol. Which costs two times less but is also burned twice as fast, so you don't even save! Drill for oil in alaska get some more refineries running and then work on alternative fuel ideas!
Watch this, and in your own mind ';what would you say?';


http://youtube.com/watch?v=3db2IMqx4j0





Alternative's will come but it will be another 15-20 years to come up with a mainstream fix, ethanol.......? Electric.........?


Nitrogen Fuel cell........?
Why not ask their screwball buddies in Congress. Pssst!!! They're called Democrats.


By the way, have you noticed how gas prices have gone through the roof since Democrats took control of Congress in 2007?
Okay, because you paying less to fill your car up is the most important thing in the world. If you need it explained you're already a lost cause.
Silly, it's not OUR country, it's their country.





Facts Ruin Cons got ';facts'; from same environmental site from group fighting drilling. What a joke. More supply equals same high price, sources please!!!!!
I think you've burned up enough buffalo on your 3rd trip to the mall. Hands off Alaska. Maybe the future will have a better use for it than a drive through drug store.
Because it might mess up the caribou's mating habits. A polar bear might eat a oily snowball... These freaks are complete idiots but they have the dem party in their back pocket....
I prefer alternative fuel sources vs more of the same. GOP supporters rarely think long term. It is always about the moment with them.
Something about elk or owls or something like that..
Why won't those woodpeckers stop drilling in your head?
Yeah let's blame them for the price of gas!
the oil we have is in reserve for the military


w/o it our country is defensless
Drilling here will not bring the price down.
Because we enjoy oxygen. You should try some.
  • concealer
  • Will the enviros ever let us drill our oil, instead of having to go hat in hand to the Saudis?

    Obviously it's a terrible idea to rely on them for anything!!!Will the enviros ever let us drill our oil, instead of having to go hat in hand to the Saudis?
    no they want to bring america to her knees at all cost. they have no compassion for anything but themselves. they scream the loudest and liberal dems cave into them because they are needed to keep them in office. some high muckidy muck was on fox news and he stated that eco freaks won't rest till congress and the senate put a stop to taking all carbon from the ground meaning coal and oil. no nuclear power plants i guess they want us to go back to horeses and candles and sod homes. mr doodlesWill the enviros ever let us drill our oil, instead of having to go hat in hand to the Saudis?
    No, they will not let us drill for oil in Alaska because it is not worth it.





    Even if we drilled in Alaska, it would take 10 years to be fully operational. This means many more years of giving money to the Arabian Peninsula. That is a bad idea.





    Even if we drilled in Alaska, we would still need to depend on OPEC for a lot of oil. Bad Idea.





    Our country needs to invest in a new alternative energy source that takes us completely off oil. This cannot be achieved for many years, but we need to start investing now. The rewards would be greater then drilling in Alaska.





    Conservatives should stop looking at oil and start looking at the future. If drilling in ANWR is such a good idea, show me some sources that say so.
    Even if we did drill, the US oil reserves are approximately 5% of Saudia Arabia's, and not nearly enough to meet our needs.





    Canada actually has the second largest ';known oil reserves'; in the world, but they are in the form of ';oil sands'; - not light sweet crude. Oil sands only became economically viable to refine when oil hit $40/barrel, so Canada's production is increasing monthly.





    Bottom line: The US doesn't have significant oil reserves, so as long as we are dependent on oil we will be dependent on foreign suppliers. Drilling in the artic is a short-term solution that will benefit Bush's oil buddies, but not solve the US's long-term energy needs.
    If they truly were that zealous about protecting the environment, why haven't they done anything more about the drilling run amok in western Colorado? They only protect areas that fit in their sense of self righteousness where they believe they can garner the support of typically disinterested people to help influence governmental action. If they really cared about the situation, they'd find a more sane approach to the problem that would permit at least some level of access to our own resources. There really needs to be greater attention to alternative fuel possibilities. Wind and solar aren't likely to make your transportation get you where you need to be. Tying the hands of the American public and forcing us to send all of our money overseas for middle eastern oil is hardly the tack they should be taking if they want legitimate respect in the public arena.
    As usual congress is part of the problem and not part of the solution.





    Remember Clinton vetoed this bill. Hmmm. A million barrels of oil a day.





    Enough natural gas to heat every home in the US for 100 years.
    Not while they commute to work in taxpayer subsidized mass transit and return home to email their Congressmen against opening up the east and west coasts to offshore drilling.
    I hate that Bush did that. Its below the office. I think those OPEC nation have us where they want us. Its all congresses fault, and doing NOTHING!
    This is what we call milking the cow at midnight in another barn!

    No oil spills after Katrina on Gulf Oil rigs. Does that mean drilling technologies are safer now?

    Elmo, you are so wrong, new rigs are being built all the time. No new refineries have been built since the 70s. And to answer the original question, yes the drilling technology is much safer now. More oil leaks out of the bottom of the ocean floor than leaks from drilling rigs. They have what are called 'zero discharge' technologies, nothing (no oil or any of the chemicals used in the drilling process) gets into the water.No oil spills after Katrina on Gulf Oil rigs. Does that mean drilling technologies are safer now?
    Your information is from what source? Yes, there were oil spillssss after Katrina, see below. Also, to avoid passing on fabrication you should 2nd, 3rd or even 4th check you sources and information. This way you can be sure you are educated and not passing on inaccuracies...





    Your information that there was not oil spills because of the hurrican is false. Very often the information given through news media is biased and this sounds like you got fabrication! Right away I found honest reporting in a conservate magazine called 'Business Today- online' exerpt to follow:


    ';Oil prices hit $70.80 a barrel yesterday after Katrina forced the shutdown of nearly all the region鈥檚 oil production, more than 80 per cent of gas operations and forced eight refineries along the coast to shut.





    The US Coast Guard said it received early reports of oil platforms and rigs adrift in the storm鈥檚 wake. Shell said that two of its oil drilling rigs under contract were adrift.





    An oil drilling platform broke free of its mooring in Mobile Bay, Alabama, and slammed into a bridge due to the high winds.





    Hurricane Ivan, wiped out a total of around 45 million barrels of US oil output over six months.'; The byproduct of that is OIL SPILLAGE. and Bush wants new drilling off Florida, meterologists (J.Hansen) are finding there is and will be an increase in the intensity and duration of these storms, in part, because of global climate change.





    May 2006, the U.S. Minerals Management Service published their offshore damage assessment: 113 platforms totally destroyed, and - more importantly - 457 pipelines damaged, 101 of those major lines with 10'; or larger diameter. At least 741,000 gallons were spilled from 124 reported sources (the Coast Guard calls anything over 100,000 gallons a ';major'; spill). ';





    MMS report to follow:


    ';Wells and platforms were shut down before the storm, so leakage from those facilities was minimal. Pipelines were shut down too. But what the officials failed to mention is they don't require industry to ';purge'; pipelines before a severe storm - so they were probably still loaded with oil, gas or liquid gas condensate. Any section of pipeline that was breached leaked all of that product into the Gulf within hours of the storm. That's what we think accounts for the widespread slicks seen on the imagery from September 1 and 2, covering hundreds of square miles and obviously emanating from many points of origin. These slicks dispersed after several days of high winds offshore, as shown by our followup imagery taken on September 12, but a few problems remained as evidenced by ongoing leaks from wrecked platforms. ';








    This report from MMS details the pipeline damage that occurred.








    OIL DRILLING IS NOT SAFE.





    McCain, Bush, and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich are pushing hard to open our national coastlines to oil drilling. In fact, Newt Gingrich has put together a petition like this that more than 750,000 people have signed! They鈥檙e using high gas prices and economic concerns to help their friends in the oil industry make even more money.





    But here鈥檚 the real truth behind drilling offshore:





    -- Seismic testing to locate oil creates decibel levels of 260 鈥?twice as loud as an ambulance 鈥?underwater. Exposure to these levels of noise underwater can cause disorientation, brain hemorrhaging, or even beaching for whales and dolphins.





    -- Offshore drilling creates an increased risk of oil spills close to our beaches and coastlines.





    --The need to address global warming means it is time to invest in renewable energy sources. Drilling for oil in dangerous locations will take years to reach the market and will only serve to increase global warming impacts when it does.





    Tell John McCain that if he wants to stop global warming, he needs to stop helping the big oil companies and start making real change.





    Ultimatly by drilling we have small short term gains for high long term costs. There is immense pollution to water and air done by drilling. And even if the drilling starts we will see NO decrease in fuel costs. The oil companies will be the beneficiaries because they will have lower costs per barrell, but will not pass on the saving. The gas crises of the 70's showed us that increase profit or supply does not translate into less cost for the consumer.No oil spills after Katrina on Gulf Oil rigs. Does that mean drilling technologies are safer now?
    We build new oil rigs all the time and drilling platforms are only part of the solution it is also the extraction methods that have improved,more oil seeps naturally from the ocean floor in one year than we have spilled from an off shore platform in the history of U.S. deep sea drilling.
    we haven't built any new oil rigs since the 70's how did we make them safer? it's like wine it gets better with age? haha


    edit


    really well i did not know that coolhand, i'll admit i was wrong then, surprising that liberals admit they are wrong?


    i found something interesting though, http://www.wtrg.com/rotaryrigs.html


    why have more offshore oil rigs closed down than opened up this year from last?
    Sure it is...I know the far left wants to say it is not because they don't like oil. The want us all to ride bikes and drive electric cars.
    yes. early spills were caused by cracks underseas





    hugs!
    Yes, MUCH safer.
    Yes. Don't tell the Liberals though.
    Sure.

    If you had to choose one, would you rather drill for oil in Alaska, or send troops to war in Iraq?

    I know there are other solutions, just if you had to pick one. Personally, I think we have more involved animal rights groups to protect the Alaskan animals than we do have people who would tend to the young men and women fighting.





    P. S., I am a very staunch supporter of animals and the environment, and hate war at the same time.If you had to choose one, would you rather drill for oil in Alaska, or send troops to war in Iraq?
    Alaska. You know, you're for the environment and that's great. When people oppose drilling in Alaska, they often show the most picturesque scenery in their opposition. Truth be told, the places where the oil is abundant is in the most barren looking spots in the entire state. Not only that, if we used our own oil and didn't buy from the Arab people, we wouldn't be giving our hard earned money to the types that sponsor terrorism. No terrorism support, less terrorism.





    I say we drill our own oil, and put part of the profits into conservation and part into developing alternative fuels.If you had to choose one, would you rather drill for oil in Alaska, or send troops to war in Iraq?
    We need to drill oil. We can move the animals to Canada until everything is bult then move them back.
    I guess since the 2 aren't related, we're not suppossed to be in Iraq for oil, I would probably choose Alaska, but............


    if I was convinced that there was a danger to our country in Iraq


    or if I felt innocent people were being slaughtered by the thousands (like they were in Iraq in the early 90's) I would vote for soldiers in Iraq.


    Our gas prices possibly lowering by having a new oil source wouldn't be worth ignoring the human suffering.
    I would prefer to go cold and walk where I need to if it meant that millions of Iraqi children had a chance at a peaceful future.
    Although drilling in Alaska might alleviate our dependence on Middle Eastern oil, it would not stop the spread of Islamo-fascism. So we would have to fight anyway, unless we decide to surrender to them even at home.
    Neither.


    We (well, someone does) have the technology to eliminate most of the need for petroleum fuels.


    Nicola Tesla developed devices that could derive electricity from the air or the ground. Unfortunately, he didn't do a good job of publicizing his findings. After he died, the CIA scooped up his stuff and they have control of the best technology, and they aren't about to share it with us...


    Since we are held hostage to the oil companies, we are forced to use mostly petrol-based fuels and the U.S. troops are in Iraq to ensure that global corporations have a handle on the oil, there.
    Alaska
    This question is like asking: ';Which is better - an apple or a screwdriver?';





    Drilling for oil in Alaska and the war in Iraq have nothing to do with each other.
    They have nothing to do with each other.





    I would do both.





    We need oil and the Iraqi people need to be freed from violence.





    Good question...you get a star from me!
    only drilling is our profession
    That's a no-brainer. Everyone will choose Alaska. No matter how much people like animals, no one should ever choose it over human life. Unlike the current administration...
    I think the best thing is to educate yourself so you know what is really going on in the world.
    Alaska
    I am with you, but why post the question??
    How about we stop being ridiculous and invest in some renewable energy vehicles.





    www.myersmotors.com/





    Too expensive for most people right now but it's already available and suits the needs of most people for day-to-day activities.





    Drilling in Alaska for oil isn't any better of an option then sending troops to Iraq. All it does it change the location of the problem. Developing better electric cars solves the problem.

    The liberals who have refused to let the US drill our own oil, are they traitors?

    If you peel away the spin and the lies, at the end of the day, liberals practice civil disobedience when they are out of power, they actively harm the USA, to create problems that can be politicized, to gain political advantage.





    Do liberals who claim they love the environment, sincerely want the US to be dependant on foreign oil, to undermine our economy?





    Are these liberals traitors?The liberals who have refused to let the US drill our own oil, are they traitors?
    No


    Those Americans that allow any type of liberal fascism is a traitorsThe liberals who have refused to let the US drill our own oil, are they traitors?
    ONE PIECE OF LEGISLATION IS WHY OIL IS THROUGH THE ROOF


    Lay, DeLay, Gramm, Gramm %26amp; Clinton





    PART ONE


    http://www.star-telegram.com/104/story/6…





    PART TWO


    http://www.star-telegram.com/ed_wallace/…





    Republicans offer the same old tired slogans that they have touted throughout the Bush years and that haven’t done anything to combat the increase in gas prices





    - More Drilling: Domestic drilling has not led to lower prices. Since 2000, drilling has increased dramatically – climbing about 66 percent– while gas prices continue to increase. and gas companies have shown that they cannot keep pace with the rate of drilling permits that the federal government is handing out – over the past 4 years they have received and are sitting on nearly 10,000 permits that they aren’t using to increase domestic production. Since 1999, drilling permits for oil and gas development on public lands increased more than 361 percent.





    - OCS: The vast majority of federal oil and gas resources located on the OCS are already open for development - of all the oil and gas believed to exist on the OCS, nearly 80% of oil and 82% of natural gas is located in areas already open for leasing. In 2006, the federal government opened 8.3 million new acres in the Gulf of Mexico to drilling, yet gasoline prices have increased by $1.69 per gallon. Only 10.5 million of the 44 million leased offshore acres are actually producing oil or gas.





    - Open ANWR: EIA estimates that if we open ANWR today, twenty years down the road, at peak production, gas prices would be lowered at the maximum by $1.44 per barrel, which translates to only a few cents a gallon. Increased conservation and the use of alternative technologies in the last three years have cut the projected need for imported oil between now and 2050 by more than 100 billion barrels (EIA) – ten times more benefit than what we might be able to get a decade from now from ANWR.





    - More Refineries: We have excess refining capacity. Last week, our refineries were running at 89% capacity – well below the 95-98% capacity use rates we’ve seen this time of year for the last decade. Republicans argue that environmental regulations are preventing new refineries from being built in the U.S. From 1975 to 2000, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received only one permit request for a new refinery, which was approved. In addition, oil companies are regularly applying for – and receiving – permits to modify and expand their existing refineries.





    Republicans and Democrats have a fundamentally different approach to tackling high gas prices. Democrats are being aggressive today to lower prices and reduce dependence on foreign oil while thinking ahead to tomorrow





    - Working to Address Rising Gas Prices





    - Enacted legislation to increase oil supply by temporarily suspending the fill of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, the nation’s crude oil stockpile. (H.R. 6022)





    - Gave the FTC new authority to crack down on those manipulating wholesale energy markets to keep prices high in the Energy Independence and Security Act (H.R. 6)





    - Approved the Gas Price Relief for Consumers Act (H.R. 6074) to hold the OPEC monopoly accountable for price fixing that flouts the free market and artificially drives up the cost of crude oil.





    - Passed the Federal Price Gouging Prevention Act (H.R. 1252) to investigate price gouging by retailers who may be using the cover of high prices to unfairly inflate their rates even further.





    - Investing in a Sustainable, Energy Independent America





    - Enacted the landmark Energy Independence and Security Act (H.R. 6) that raised vehicle fuel efficiency for the first time in 32 years and increased the renewable fuels standard.





    - Passed the Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Act (H.R. 5351) to end unnecessary subsidies to oil companies making record profits and invest in clean, renewable energy and energy efficiency.





    - Approved the Renewable Energy and Job Creation Act (H.R. 6049) to renew and expand tax incentives for renewable energy.





    - Passed the Food and Energy Security Act (H.R. 2419) that promotes the development of biofuels, including those from non-corn sources.





    If costs go up then of course prices go up. But why then would profits go up? Shouldn’t it be a wash? YEP





    But here’s another wrinkle…the cost for Middle East oil producers hasn’t gone up!





    FACT





    Oil executives and speculators are getting rich on the backs of American consumers. Indeed, on average, it costs a company such as ExxonMobil about $20 to extract a barrel of oil, which in turn is sold for more than $115 a barrel. Refiner profit margins have also been soaring at vertically integrated oil companies, which helps explain how the largest five oil companies in America have posted more than $550 billion in profits since 2001


    http://www.citizen.org/pressroom/release…





    John McCain doesn’t think it’s “too important” when and if our troops ever come home. Just as long as they stop getting themselves killed over there!





    Iraq and Iran have met and agree the Number One impediment to progress there is the presence of US Troops. Whose out of touch now Grandpa?





    New polling shows Obama beating McCain in the General Election, but remember it’s just a snapshot in time. We have work to do. Right wing Talk Shows are smearing Obama everyday with lies and even allegations of “terrorist hand signals”. Sheesh. Desperate men do desperate things. Obama has set up a website for you to report any smears and to fact check the ones that are already out there.


    http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/f…





    And I’ve included a little IQ test for you today. Test your Candidate IQ!





    Grandpa


    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/natio…





    Obama


    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/polit…








    HOMEWORK





    Head ot the FTC was an Exxon Mobil lawyer until 2005


    http://www.davidsirota.com/2005/09/bush-…





    Currently the Head of the FTC is William E. Kovacic who has done nothing with the new authority Congress gave him in 2007


    http://www.examiner.com/p-154031~Pelosi_…





    DUMB JOHN MCCAIN QUOTES


    http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/johnm…





    GRANDPA MCCAIN





    When the troops come home “is not too important”


    http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?u…





    Here’s Senator John Kerry’s response AND Senator John Thune’s attempt at damage control


    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/…





    IRAQ AND IRAN TALK





    THE NUMBER ONE PROBLEM IS THE PRESENCE OF AMERICAN TROOPS


    http://www.startribune.com/templates/Pri…





    Americans ask “IS THERE PROGRESS IN IRAQ?” Answer - No one knows


    http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0610/p03s0…





    Obama widens lead against John McCain


    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB12132204…





    Sen. Obama leads among independent voters, 41% to 36%.


    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/…





    Most women however do not know that Granpa’s position on ROE v WADE is to ABOLISH it completely.


    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/…





    Senator Obama has a new website to fight the smears and rumours that are spread about him and his wife Michelle. If you see something SAY something.


    http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/f…





    http://www.time.com/time/politics/articl…

    Why does McCain want to Drill for More Oil?

    Obviously global warming and fuel emission goes hand in hand. If we keep using oil, won't the Earth climate be to drastic for us to live in? Isn't there already alternative fuel sources and can't we just invest in them so they'd be cheap for the public as a whole? Shouldn't we care more about how long we'll be able to survive with Global Warming?Why does McCain want to Drill for More Oil?
    Drilling is a bridge to keep oil prices down now.





    It buys us time.





    Why does McCain want to Drill for More Oil?
    Global warming is a serious issue. Getting to a point where we can rely on alternative fuels without bankrupting the government (oops, too late) is also important.





    We consume 25% of the worlds oil and we only have 3% of the reserves. That is a problem. Over the next 20 years, we can turn that problem into an opportunity. This is a capitalist society (sorry if you are a socialist). We can MAKE MONEY developing alternative fuels.





    We need to develop lots and lots of NUCLEAR. But we also need to develop and enhance thermal heat for homes (did you know this is already economically viable, yet only.005% of homes have it), wind, tidal, et.c (except forget solar...it doesn't work).





    In the short-run we also need to drill. Every barrell we can find is $70-130 that does not go to a terrorist.
    You are correct. Drilling for more oil will not resolve our energy crisis nor will it enhance our ability to control climate change. Despite the fact that drilling will not produce results for another decade or so, the U.S. uses 25% of the world's oil while we only maintain 3% of its resources.
    so the bush cronies can continue to make money.
  • concealer
  •